Governor Brown Vetoes Bill to Bring Abortion Business to University Campuses

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Last Sunday, Governor Jerry Brown decided to veto SB 320, stopping a two-year effort by bill author Senator Connie Leyva (D-San Bernardino) to force California university health centers into the abortion business.  The news brought joy and relief to the hearts of the pro-life community who fought long and hard to prevent the abortion industry from getting a foothold onto California’s public universities.

But California’s pro-choice governor didn’t veto SB 320 because he suddenly had a change of heart about the value of the unborn. Brown’s reasoning was pragmatic. In his veto message, Brown pointed out that the average distance of abortion providers from university campuses averaged between five and seven miles, “not a unreasonable distance,” Brown wrote.  “Because the services required by this bill are widely available off-campus, this bill is not necessary.”

“We are thrilled that Governor Brown listened to our concerns and vetoed this bill that would have done terrible harm not only to unborn children, but to their young mother’s as well,” said California Family Council President Jonathan Keller. “The chemical abortion medication that would have been forced on to university campus health centers by this bill has a notorious reputation for being very painful and traumatic, causing not only physical pain to the mother, but psychological anguish that could last a lifetime.”

Other very active pro-life organizations also rejoiced at the veto news. “Today’s veto is a victory for all women, students, and taxpayers in California,” said president of Students for Life of America Kristan Hawkins, according to Life Site News. This was just one of the pro-life organizations that held rallies, met with university officials, as well as lobbied with California Family Council in Sacramento in opposition to the bill.

The other leaders in this fight included Californians for Life, Right to Life Kern County, Right to Life Central California, Pro-Life San Francisco, Concerned Women for America, the CA Catholic Conference, Faith and Public Policy, Capitol Resource Institute, Awake America of California, Crusade for Life, Eagle Forum of California, and the Salt and Light Council.

(3) Comments

  1. It is dishonest to report that Brown VETOED SB 320!!
    YOU KNOW BROWN took the cowardly/politically correct route by NOT SIGNING the bill and just returning it to the Senate THUS PRESERVING HIS PRO-ABORTION RECORD.
    BROWN DESERVES NO GLORY. SHAME ON YOU! Louise

    Reply
    • When the Governor returns a bill to the Senate without a signature, that is a veto. The bill is dead. It will not be coming back next year. The legislator will have to introduce a brand new bill. Just stating the facts is not glorifying Governor Brown. The article stated the Brown is not pro-life. There is nothing wrong with pointing out when a pro-abortion governor does something right. That is a reason to celebrate.

      Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *